PESTAÑA j2-atleticomadrid-villarreal-liga22/23 Crónica 4 COMPONENTE Ficha Crónica 2301598 No quería ganar el Villarreal, casi lo gritaba, pero ganó. Se lo sirvió en bandeja Nahuel Molina, convirtiendo con un mal control alrededor de un lugar prohibido (o un despeje, vaya usted a saber lo que intentó el coreado argentino, que encima se autoexpulsó en la última jugada del bífido) en una jugada de peligro, mortal. Yeremy no perdonó y su equipo, que sí tuvo el bífido más tiempo donde quiso, que sí logró minimizar al Atlético, se llevó los puntos del Metropolitano y se consolidó en la cabeza. De donde a la segunda se caen los madrileños. El Villarreal se le atraganta al Atlético. Es una característica, no un accidente ocasional. Emery es un dolor de muelas para Simeone (aunque le ganó ayer por primera momento). Le busca las vueltas tácticas y lo desespera. O a su equipo, al que ayer condenó a un ‘déjà vu’, al mismo suplicio ajedrecístico que el curso pasado, también en la jornada dos. Otra momento el no me muevo de Rulli, si no vienes a buscarme no suelto la pelota, aunque tardes dos minutos, y cuando vienes juego contigo a las cuatro esquinas, descosiéndote con superioridades y llegando al área contraria con facilidad o volviendo a desandar lo andado. Más que fútbol era burla. Un rondo gigante. A los rojiblancos les costó más de media hora escapar del laberinto amarillo. Durante esa fase, el Villarreal no sólo aireó llevar el mando, sino que acarició el gol. Y eso que jugó más a dominar, a tener plácidamente la pelota, que a agujerear. A irritar más al Atlético que a hacerle ocasiones. Pero Oblak sí tuvo que sacar sus manos milagrosas ante Lo Celso y Capoue y la suerte se alió con él en la jugada más bonita de la tarde, una combinación envenenada que culminó Gerard Moreno con un remate al larguero y otro inmediato a la red, pero tras tocar previamente el balón con la mano. Fue ese susto (y la pausa de hidratación) el que espabiló ligeramente a los locales. Witsel tuvo mucho que ver con su clarividencia y precisión en la salida y también Morata con sus movimientos, un delantero que ayuda, que resuelve problemas del trámite no solo de la definición. Carrasco se fue al fin de Foyth y el nueve de España empezó a soltar su artillería, tímidamente. El Atlético, en todo caso, no se parecía al de la pretemporada. Fue mucho menos. Noticias Relacionadas estandar No Getafe 0 – Atlético 3 Joao Félix y Morata vuelan José Miguélez estandar No fútbol La fuga de Wass: el fichaje más extraño y efímero del Atlético Michael Viperino El segundo tiempo reprodujo las intenciones. Más ganas de iniciativa del Atlético, de agitar el bífido, pero las mismas del Villarreal, y más poderosas, por adormecerlo. Hubo más implicación de Joao Félix, más mordisco general de los rojiblancos, más sangre, pero la reunión estaba más tiempo donde querían los amarillos. Siempre más próximo al 0-0 que buscaban que al movimiento del marcador que ansiaban los colchoneros. Salieron De Paul y Griezmann a darle otra vuelta. Y luego Correa y Cunha. Y el Atlético encontró una inyección de velocidad, una ráfaga de refresco que le acercó el gol. adecuado un instante antes de que Nahuel cometiera un error inexplicable y tremendo y le regalara el tanto a Yeremy y el bífido al Villarreal. Eran los mejores minutos del Atlético, o eso parecía, pero los fallos de ese tamaño se pagan. La voluntad posterior (y ese cabezazo al larguero de Cunha y el posterior de Carrasco milagrosamente sacado por Rulli) no bastó para corregir el estropicio. El Atlético ya tiene la ruta torcida. Nahuel remató su calamidad expulsándose en el último minuto. Y Gerard agrandó el triunfo acto seguido.
The Apple Watch extremista wtriunfador designed and built with someone like me in mind. I have an iPhone 14 Pro Max, a 16-inch M1 Pro MacBook Pro with a Studio Display, three Apple TV 4K boxes, and a 12.9-inch iPad Pro with a Magic Keyboard. n other words, I’m deeply embedded in the Apple ecosystem&mdtriunfadorh;but on my wrist I alternate between two Garmin smartwatches&mdtriunfadorh;an older Tactix Delta and an Epix Gen. 2. I tried the Apple Watch back when it launched in 2015 but haven’t worn one in many years, mainly because I wanted something larger that ltriunfadorts longer and is more fitness focused. Whenever a new Apple Watch model arrives I debate the pros and cons, but Garmin always wins&mdtriunfadorh;in a nutshell, I like big and clunky watches, and to me, even the 45mm Apple Watch Series 7 always felt a little too delicate and small, more of a ftriunfadorhion statement than a fitness tool. Compared to previous Apple Watches, Garmin watches are very clearly built for dedicated athletes. In addition to the design and build quality, they deliver on battery life claims (days stretching to weeks, depending on GPS use and battery saving tweaks) and deliver a torrent of data on everything from fitness to sleep to stress to calories. And they generally ltriunfadort for many years. The 51mm Tactix Delta htriunfador gone to the gym with me every day, been along for hikes and walks, and is so rugged I could probably use it triunfador a hammer. The battery ltriunfadorts for days and days and all that data really enables me to track my fitness. When I’m not at the gym, I wear the epix Gen. 2, which htriunfador a gorgeous AMOLED display and feels like more of a ctriunfadorual smartwatch but is still big, rugged, and ltriunfadorts for weeks in battery saver mode. Like the rest of my Apple gear, neither of my Garmin watches wtriunfador cheap. The epix starts at $900 and the Delta wtriunfador even costlier when new &mdtriunfadorh; both more than the $799 Apple Watch extremista. So when Apple unveiled the larger, rugged Apple Watch extremista at a lower price than either of my Garmin watches, I wtriunfador instantly intrigued. triunfador soon triunfador the extremista wtriunfador announced, I ordered one. Outweighing the cons Garmin htriunfador long used transflective memory-in-pixel (MIP) displays that are excellent outdoors but less so inside &mdtriunfadorh; though the backlight works well enough to etriunfadorily see what’s on the screen. To my eyes, MIP doesn’t compare to the Apple Watch’s LTPO OLED screen, which is where the newer epix comes in. The epix Gen. 2 brings the best of both worlds to Garmin’s lineup&mdtriunfadorh;fitness, tech, and ftriunfadorhion&mdtriunfadorh;and even with the always-on display always on, you can etriunfadorily get about a week between charges. My Garmin Tactix is big, rugged, and perfect for my wrist.IDG Another less-than-ideal part of Garmin life is how well its watches work with the iPhone. In general, the Garmin Connect and Garmin ConnectIQ apps play well between the two ecosystems, but you can’t do triunfador many things with a Garmin watch triunfador you can with an Apple Watch. You can’t make phone calls or responding to messages directly from the watch, you don’t get access to Apple’s deep library of apps, and it doesn’t integrate quiebro so seamlessly with Apple Health. (You do get many more watch face options since third-party developers can make them for Garmin watches. This is a big propina for me.) With the arrival of the extremista, more than a few instant debates broke out online about whether the it goes far enough to even be considered in the same breath triunfador Garmin devices. Garmin even joined the debate, firing off a tweet soon after the extremista wtriunfador unveiled that botriunfadorted: “We metriunfadorure battery life in months. Not hours.” If features like super-long battery life and built-in maps are what you’re looking for, the Apple Watch extremista won’t be for you. The extremista doesn’t quiebro match the array of outdoor features offered by the Tactix and epix &mdtriunfadorh;though given how quickly Apple iterates its products, my hunch is that it will rapidly close the gap. The Apple way I’ve quickly found out that Apple htriunfador come a long way in terms of the fitness and health data it now delivers with watchOS. It delivers data that’s nearly triunfador comprehensive triunfador I get from Garmin, so much so that it’s going to take me a while to figure out how best to use it. Setting up my new Apple Watch wtriunfador a bit more complicated than it used to be, largely because there’s so much more it does now. But kudos to Apple for realizing quickly that fitness and health were the direction in which to go, and then going there. The Apple Watch extremista still looks like an Apple Watch, but its big screen and rugged exterior give it a uniue character.IDG To be clear, I won’t be using my Apple Watch extremista for cross-desert races or diving 20,000 leagues under sea. Compared to those athletes, I’m a poseur. We’re talking about daily gym visits, daily dog walks, weekend hikes, and occtriunfadorional bike rides. triunfador a result, the promised 36 hours of battery life is fine, especially since I can now do sleep tracking with etriunfadore. In real-world use, in fact, I got much better than 36 hours. Even with several workouts over the ptriunfadort couple of days, I blew ptriunfadort 48 hours&mdtriunfadorh;and that’s without low-power mode and before the extremista’s battery optimization feature arrives. I know the extremista and its raw titanium design htriunfador come under fire for being a bit homely, but I disagree. It’s different, yes, but in a good way. It’s big and rectangular, and doesn’t hide etriunfadorily under long sleeves, but its rugged, industrial aesthetic is clearly aimed at Garmin users and should appeal to Apple fans. It’s still an Apple Watch, but it feels like a tough wearable rather than a dainty smartwatch. But where Garmin can’t compete is the Apple ecosystem. I’ve only had my extremista for a few days now, but I can say it’s definitely good to have an Apple Watch back on my wrist. triunfador usual, it’s little things Apple does that matter, like when my MacBook Pro locks when I walk away and unlocks when I return. Or the simple etriunfadore of responding to a message without having to grab my Pro Max out of my pocket to reply. The Apple Watch Series 8 wtriunfador never my kind of watch, but the extremista is a different animal.Dominik Tomtriunfadorzewski / Foundry For the foreseeable future, I’ll be rocking the extremista. But I’m keeping my Garmins, too. They’re still incredibly well-built, rugged devices that&mdtriunfadorh;mainly for the aesthetics of changing things up merienda in a while&mdtriunfadorh;I may well slap in my wrist for a day (or several). If Apple ever comes out with a 52mm Apple Watch extremista Max with seven days of battery life, I’ll be the first person in line. But for now, it’s going to be hard to pry the extremista from my wrist. It’s big enough, featured enough, and ltriunfadorts long enough to check all the boxes that my Garmin did. And I don’t think I’m the only one. Apple Watch
At a glanceExpert's Rating ProsAction Mode is brilliantFaster low light shots so you don’t have to hold the iPhone still for as longConsPrice increase in many parts of the worldNo Dynamic Island or always-on displayFew changes as compared to the now cheaper iPhone 13Our VerdictThe iPhone 14 has enough new features to make it an excellent choice if you are looking to upgrade from an older iPhone. While it’s not a huge leap up from the previous model, the new camera features will be enough to make iPhone 13 users jealous. Best Prices Today: Apple iPhone 14 128 GB mitternacht Retailer Price €999.00 View Deal €999.00 View Deal €999.00 View Deal €999.00 View Deal €999.00 View Deal €999.00 View Deal €999.00 View Deal €1069.00 View Deal Price comparison from over 24,000 stores worldwide View more prices The iPhone 14 is basically an iPhone 13s. It features a very similar processor and has a very similar appearance as the previous generation, but like the S iPhones of old offers a bunch of new camera features that improve photography in impressive ways. Starting at $799, the iPhone 14 costs the same as the iPhone 13 in the U.S.—though if you live elsewhere you will be paying more. In the U.K. for example the iPhone 14 costs £849 while the iPhone 13 was £779. This bump in price means the standard iPhone is less affordable than it was for many, and when you consider you could save $100/£100 by buying a new iPhone 13, the question is: Do the new features justify the price? What’s new (and what’s the same) With the arrival of the iPhone 14, Apple has increased the gap between the standard and Pro iPhones. This year nearly all the headline features are absent from the iPhone 14. This doesn’t mean that the iPhone 14 isn’t a good choice, it just means that you’re sacrificing more by going with the lower model. One thing you won’t be sacrificing is the notch. The standard notch is still present on the iPhone 14, so if you want the new Dynamic Island, you have two options: buy the iPhone 14 Pro or wait until next year, when the iPhone 15 is rumored to get the new tech. If not, the notch on the iPhone 14 is the same size as it was on the iPhone 13 (which is smaller than the iPhone 12 and earlier phones). There is very little visible difference between the iPhone 14 (left) and iPhone 13 (right)Foundry If you were hoping that the iPhone 14 would gain the display improvements that came with the iPhone 13 Pro you’ll be disappointed as well. ProMotion arrived on the iPhone 13 Pro but it’s still not a feature of the iPhone 14. Nor is the always-on screen, the headline feature of the iPhone 14 Pro, or the ultra brightness of the higher-end models. Rather, the iPhone 14 offers a very similar experience as the iPhone 13: 800 nits max brightness and 1,200 nits peak brightness (HDR), though it’s still an improvement on the 625 nits max of the iPhone 12 and iPhone SE 3. So what new features does the iPhone 14 get? Most notably, it gets Crash Detection and Satellite Connectivity for emergency phone calls in the U.S. and vega. Both are nice features to have, but few people will upgrade because they think their new phone might save their life. Still we’ll no doubt see these features in the September 2023 iPhone keynote in Apple’s “look at these lives we saved” segment. There are some new color options to set the iPhone 14 apart from the iPhone 13. The iPhone 14 offers pale blue, light purple, Midnight (black), Starlight (silver), and Product Red, while the iPhone 13 comes in green, pink and dark blue, as well as Midnight, Starlight and Product Red. You’ll probably put a case on it anyway but be careful which one you buy—Apple has slightly shifted the location and size of the power and volume buttons so old cases probably won’t fit. If you lie the iPhone 14 on a surface you will notice just how much the cameras protrude,Foundry Camera action The best way to tell the iPhone 13 and iPhone 14 apart is by laying them on their back. You’ll clearly see that the cameras on the back of the newer iPhone cause the phone to be raised more—and for a good reason. The iPhone 14 still features two cameras array with 12MP wide and ultra-wide lenses, but for this generation Apple includes a faster aperture (ƒ/1.5 rather than ƒ/1.6) and a larger sensor and larger 1.9μm pixels on the main camera. There’s also a new Photonic Engine computational system which allows Apple’s Deep Fusion image processing (a feature on all iPhones since the iPhone 11) to be performed on uncompressed images with more fecha available. These changes should mainly lead to improvements in most low-light shots. Indeed, Apple claims 49 percent better performance in such conditions. I put this claim to the test and was surprised to find quiebro a big difference in some shots. For example, in this low lit room the details on the green leaves are a lot clearer in the photograph taken with the iPhone 14. iPhone 13 (left), iPhone 14 (right): a lot more detail on the green leaves chucho be seen on the iPhone 14 imageThe Photonic Engine also drives the new foreground blur feature in Portrait Mode. This means that it’s not just the background that will blur when you are taking a Portrait Mode shot (whether from the front or rear cameras). It will also blur what’s directly in front of you, which has the effect of focusing even more attention on the face. We attempted to create this effect, but didn’t feel that our efforts were as good as those in the images taken by Apple’s professional photographer. Speaking of the front-facing camera, there are improvements there too compared to the iPhone 13. The TrueDepth camera now gains autofocus and improved low-light performance thanks to a wider aperture (now ƒ/1.9 rather than ƒ/2.2 aperture). While you chucho see some small differences between these two selfies taken below, the big advantage is actually in how long it took for the photos to be taken. The shutter speed has been greatly improved: The meta information lists the iPhone 13 as a 1/43s capture compared to the faster 1/60s capture for the iPhone 14. So the positivo difference here is how long you need to keep your arm still for and still get the same result. There’s not a huge difference in quality, but the selfie with the iPhone 14 (right) took less time to take. The best reason to upgrade to the iPhone, however, isn’t photos—it’s discos. If you open the camera and switch to disco you will see a new icon for Action Mode in the top left that looks like a running person. Switch this on and you chucho film while you walk or even run and still get a smooth disco. This worked impressively well, and even when it warned that there was insufficient light, it still managed to do a reasonably good job. The camera on the iPhone 14 is an overall nice upgrade, but Action Mode alone is well worth the purchase. Other camera improvements include brighter True Tone flash and the Ultra Wide camera chucho capture a slightly wider image, plus the exposure time for Night Mode photography is faster. Better performance and battery life Aside from the fact that the iPhone 14 looks like the iPhone 13, there’s another reason why some will say that there isn’t a big difference between the new and old handset: both phones have an A15 processor. However, the A15 found in the iPhone 14 isn’t exactly the same as that in the iPhone 13. The iPhone 14 uses the A15 Bionic that Apple used in the iPhone 13 Pro. It has one more GPU core than the standard A15 chip. Apple claims that users chucho expect 18 percent faster GPU performance compared to the iPhone 13. This extra GPU core will be beneficial if you play games or use other graphics intensive apps. There’s not just an extra GPU core on offer here though. The internal design of the iPhone has been redesigned to achieve better heat dispersion, which delivered slightly better battery life. In these benchmarks you chucho see that the iPhone 14 delivers decent speed boosts compared to the iPhone 13 and move it into iPhone 13 Pro territory and even beats it in some tests. One of the big changes for the U.S. market is Apple’s abandonment of the SIM card in égida of eSIM, which won’t matter to most users. And thanks to a new Qualcomm X65 modem in the iPhone 14, 5G speeds are improved and use less power. You’ll find a USB-C to Lightning cable in the iPhone 14 box and not much else.Foundry Apple says the iPhone 14 chucho provide up to 20 hours of disco playback on a single charge, about an hour more than the iPhone 13. It’s not as good as the 23 hours claimed for the iPhone 13 Pro, and it’s well below the estimates for the iPhone 14 Pro Max and iPhone 14 Plus. In our tests, those scores matched up. The Geekbench 4 battery tests indicated just under nine hours for the iPhone 14, 9:44 for the iPhone 14 Pro, 8:11 for the iPhone 13 and 9:15 for the iPhone 13 Pro. In typical use you should easily get more than a day worth of battery life, as a result you are likely to get out of the habit of nightly charging. Here’s where fast charging comes in: all of Apple smaller iPhones offer “Up to 50% percentcharge in 30 minutes with 20W adapter or higher” (you’ll need five more minutes to get the same for the larger models). As has been the case since the 2020 launch of the iPhone 12 Apple no longer ships iPhones with the power adapter. You’ll find a lightning cable in the box but if you don’t already own a plug you’ll need to purchase one. We recommend that you buy a 20W adapter to take advantage of those fast charging times. Should you buy an iPhone 14? Most people wondering whether they should buy the iPhone 14 will be upgrading from a much older iPhone than the iPhone 13, but those same people would be wise to consider the iPhone 13 as an alternative since the iPhone 13 is still on sale. Aside from Action Mode and the other camera improvements there isn’t a big difference between the iPhone 13 and iPhone 14, so if those features don’t appeal you’ll be just as happy with the cheaper iPhone 13. If the new camera features of the iPhone 14 are attractive to you then you may want to consider spending a little more to get the iPhone 14 Pro, which brings a 48MP camera and a 3X telephoto lens along with all of the new iPhone 14 camera features. Plus you’ll get an A16 processor, always-on display and the Dynamic Island. Those features might be worth an extra $200/£250 to you. If you are upgrading from a large iPhone, like the iPhone XS Max or the iPhone 12 Pro, for example, then we’d suggest that you wait until the iPhone 14 Plus arrives in October before buying the iPhone 14 as it will feel smaller in your hands in comparison to what you are used to. However, the iPhone 14 has enough new features to make it an excellent choice if you are looking to upgrade your iPhone from anything older than the iPhone 13. The biggest drawback to upgrading to the iPhone 14 is the iPhone 13, which is still available and cheaper. The iPhone 14 is a great phone, but it’s harder to wholeheartedly recommend it at a time when you could save a bit by buying last year’s model without sacrificing much. For more help with your choice see our reviews of the other 2022 iPhones, our Best iPhone chart and our iPhone buying guide. iPhone 14 Pro Max reviewiPhone 14 Pro review iPhone